<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SW Development tools &#8211; Wiki &amp; Bugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/</link>
	<description>Enough virtual, it's time for something real by Oren Teich.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ontic Oren » SW Development tools - Wiki &#38; Bugs &#171; Peter Bakker&#8217;s Sketches</title>
		<link>http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Ontic Oren » SW Development tools - Wiki &#38; Bugs &#171; Peter Bakker&#8217;s Sketches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] am on March 25, 2008 &#124; # &#124;   Tags: Wiki   Oren Teich did look into requirements management tools and realized that the MOST critical success factor has always been alignment. If engineering, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am on March 25, 2008 | # |   Tags: Wiki   Oren Teich did look into requirements management tools and realized that the MOST critical success factor has always been alignment. If engineering, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oren</title>
		<link>http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Oren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Hi Mairon,
I&#039;ve decided on Jira, Confluence, plus a plugin called Greenhopper.  I&#039;m insanely happy with it.  We&#039;ve been through a full sprint planning session, created 100 user stories, put 20 in iteration one, added 60 tasks, and now actually coding.  So far, it&#039;s REALLY good.  I&#039;ve got a more recent blog post on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mairon,<br />
I&#8217;ve decided on Jira, Confluence, plus a plugin called Greenhopper.  I&#8217;m insanely happy with it.  We&#8217;ve been through a full sprint planning session, created 100 user stories, put 20 in iteration one, added 60 tasks, and now actually coding.  So far, it&#8217;s REALLY good.  I&#8217;ve got a more recent blog post on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mairon</title>
		<link>http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Mairon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>What did you end up going for? It&#039;s been a month ago :)

We are actually in the same boat right now and are doing the same research. We were gonna go with VersionOne until we realized that it does not include a wiki.

Then I stumbled upon Assembla (www.assembla.com).
And I have to say that it looks really good.
It has many features and supports many things (like scrum, wiki, trac/svn integration, a separate ticketing system etc) but still manages too look and feel simple enough for a small team as opposed to VersionOne.

I&#039;m currently evaluating both and then we&#039;ll make a decision but I have to say that Assembla is looking like the better option right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did you end up going for? It&#8217;s been a month ago :)</p>
<p>We are actually in the same boat right now and are doing the same research. We were gonna go with VersionOne until we realized that it does not include a wiki.</p>
<p>Then I stumbled upon Assembla (www.assembla.com).<br />
And I have to say that it looks really good.<br />
It has many features and supports many things (like scrum, wiki, trac/svn integration, a separate ticketing system etc) but still manages too look and feel simple enough for a small team as opposed to VersionOne.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently evaluating both and then we&#8217;ll make a decision but I have to say that Assembla is looking like the better option right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Ontic Oren » SW Development tools - Wiki &#38; Bugs Agile Cases</title>
		<link>http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Ontic Oren » SW Development tools - Wiki &#38; Bugs Agile Cases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] Teich did look into requirements management tools and realized that the MOST critical success factor has always been alignment. If engineering, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Teich did look into requirements management tools and realized that the MOST critical success factor has always been alignment. If engineering, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Dowideit</title>
		<link>http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Dowideit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>On the other hand - you can integrate Trac and TWiki too - see my other work :) http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Plugins/TracOnTWikiContrib

Sven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand &#8211; you can integrate Trac and TWiki too &#8211; see my other work :) <a href="http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Plugins/TracOnTWikiContrib" rel="nofollow">http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Plugins/TracOnTWikiContrib</a></p>
<p>Sven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Dowideit</title>
		<link>http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Dowideit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onticoren.com/2008/03/22/sw-development-tools-wiki-bugs/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>did you consider looking at using TWiki and the TWiki based BugsContrib? (http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Plugins/BugsContrib) 

BugsContrib is a TWikiApplication that has been distilled from a much larger Task management system, and as its a TWikiApp, is pretty simple to extend to do whatever you want / need.

To see it in use see http://develop.twiki.org/~twiki4/cgi-bin/view/Bugs

Sven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did you consider looking at using TWiki and the TWiki based BugsContrib? (<a href="http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Plugins/BugsContrib" rel="nofollow">http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Plugins/BugsContrib</a>) </p>
<p>BugsContrib is a TWikiApplication that has been distilled from a much larger Task management system, and as its a TWikiApp, is pretty simple to extend to do whatever you want / need.</p>
<p>To see it in use see <a href="http://develop.twiki.org/~twiki4/cgi-bin/view/Bugs" rel="nofollow">http://develop.twiki.org/~twiki4/cgi-bin/view/Bugs</a></p>
<p>Sven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->